Home / Procedures / Facelift / SMAS facelift techniques

SMAS facelift techniques

The SMAS is the layer of fibrous tissue and muscle under the facial fat, and nearly every facelift done by board-certified plastic surgeons tightens it. Surgeons fold it with stitches, remove a strip of it or lift it as a separate flap; reviews find high satisfaction with each method and none proven best.

What the SMAS is

The SMAS (superficial musculoaponeurotic system) is a continuous sheet that links the facial muscles to the skin and carries the cheek fat. Vladimir Mitz and Martine Peyronie described it from dissections in 1976 and noted that working under it was safe over the parotid gland in front of the ear and became dangerous further forward, where the facial nerve branches run (PMID 935283).

Lifting the SMAS moves the cheek and jowl tissue itself. In cadavers, lifts that tightened the SMAS raised the face vertically, and a skin-only lift tightened only horizontally (PMID 36332084).

Where it came from

  • 1976: Mitz and Peyronie named the layer and showed it could be used in facelifts (PMID 935283).
  • 1977: John Owsley lifted the SMAS and the neck platysma together as one flap (PMID 928549), and reported his longer experience with it in 1983 (PMID 6828592).
  • 1977: Thomas Rees and Sherrell Aston did a sub-SMAS lift on one side of the face and a skin lift on the other, and observers saw no difference at late review; the study did not test the longer flaps that came later (PMID 928550).
  • 1992: Fritz Barton released the deep attachments of the SMAS over the cheek muscles and improved the fold beside the mouth, an effect that seemed to last up to 4 years (PMID 1409995). His high SMAS flap, cut along the cheekbone arch, carried the lift into the midface (PMID 19332004, PMID 14663239).
  • 1997: Daniel Baker described the lateral SMASectomy, a faster operation with flap-like pull (PMID 9252623); Thomas Baker and James Stuzin published their extended SMAS technique (PMID 9252622).
  • 2009 and 2014: Rod Rohrich matched the SMAS method to each side of the face and added fat grafting into the cheek fat compartments, the lift-and-fill approach (PMID 19319074, PMID 24569422).
  • Today plication is the most common method among board-certified plastic surgeons, followed by SMAS flaps, and fat grafting at the same operation is rising (PMID 38302713). Most surveyed facial plastic surgeons now perform the deep plane lift, a close relative (PMID 41251721).

How it is done

All SMAS lifts start with incisions around the ear and a skin flap. They differ in what is done to the SMAS underneath (PMID 38302713).

  • Plication: the surgeon folds the SMAS on itself with stitches and does not lift it off the deeper layer, which keeps the dissection away from the facial nerve (PMID 36332084).
  • Imbrication (SMAS stacking): the SMAS is cut, overlapped and sewn, which can add fullness over the cheekbone (PMID 19319074).
  • Lateral SMASectomy: a strip of SMAS over the front edge of the parotid gland is removed and the mobile SMAS in front is sewn to the fixed SMAS behind; it combines the pull of a flap with the speed and safety of plication (PMID 18922307).
  • SMAS-platysma flap: the SMAS and the neck muscle are lifted as one flap and advanced (PMID 928549).
  • High SMAS: the flap is cut along the cheekbone arch so it lifts the midface, cheek and jawline as one unit (PMID 36563671).
  • Extended SMAS: the dissection under the SMAS continues forward past the retaining ligaments that tether the cheek (PMID 41100833).

Recent variants move the plication closer to the mobile cheek fat (the Delta facelift) (PMID 37619977), use two SMAS slings to the temple and behind the ear (PMID 42192009), or perform plication and neck tightening under local anesthesia as an outpatient (PMID 42380310).

Who it suits

  • Adults with jowls, a softened jawline and loose skin of the lower face and neck; the SMAS is lifted in almost every facelift done for these changes (PMID 38302713).
  • The method is matched to the face. Every face is asymmetric, and Rohrich chose SMASectomy or stacking for each side according to how flat the cheek had become (PMID 19319074).
  • Lateral SMASectomy is a quick, reproducible operation for carefully selected patients (PMID 18922307). In the high SMAS approach, a deeper fold beside the mouth led to a longer dissection (PMID 14663239).
  • People who have lost cheek volume usually need fat grafting with the lift, whatever the SMAS method (PMID 36729730).

Results and how long they last

Head-to-head studies find little difference between methods. In a 1996 study, patients had a limited SMAS lift on one side and an extended SMAS or composite lift on the other: the more extensive side looked better on the operating table, and by 6 to 12 months reviewers saw no difference (PMID 8942899). A 2026 cohort comparing deep plane and SMAS plication found the same satisfaction, recovery time and complication rates (PMID 42384060). In cadavers, extended dissection added only a little lift over plication except in the lower face (PMID 36332084).

  • Satisfaction was above 85% across SMAS techniques in a systematic review (PMID 38283861).
  • Reviews have not shown that dissecting further forward improves the midface or makes the result last longer (PMID 41100833, PMID 36729730).
  • How long it lasts: among patients who came back to the same surgeon for a second SMAS flap facelift, the average time between the two operations was about 12 years (PMID 20224461).
  • In that group, about 1 in 5 came back within 5 years, most often because of loss of skin elasticity (PMID 20224461).
  • After lift-and-fill, the fold beside the mouth improved by at least one grade in most patients (PMID 24569422).

Risks and how surgeons lower them

  • Facial nerve: temporary weakness of a facial muscle followed about 2 in 100 high lateral SMAS and composite lifts, more than after plication; permanent injury did not differ between techniques (PMID 30768122). Across SMAS techniques, temporary nerve injury was under 1 in 100 and permanent injury was rare (PMID 38283861).
  • Surgeons lower nerve risk by staying in the right layer: over the cheekbone arch the forehead branch lies under a separate deeper fascia, so the high SMAS cut along the arch is safe (PMID 20335873).
  • Hematoma: major bleeding under the skin was most frequent after imbrication, at about 2 in 100 (PMID 30768122). Stitches that close the space under the neck skin are one added step to lower it (PMID 40719487).
  • Skin necrosis, loss of an area of skin, was most frequent after the SMAS flap, at about 1.6 in 100 (PMID 30768122).
  • Cross-cheek depression (the "joker line"), a groove from the mouth corner toward the ear, makes a face look pulled. Most patients who develop it show a version before surgery, so it can be spotted at the consultation; it is treated by filling the groove with volume (PMID 18971739).

Recovery

  • Recovery took about 4 weeks after both SMAS plication and deep plane in a prospective comparison (PMID 42384060).
  • On the operating table the more extensive lift looks better; swelling then hides the shape, and the result is judged at 6 to 12 months (PMID 8942899).
  • SMAS plication with neck tightening can be done under tumescent local anesthesia with light sedation as needed, with patients going home the same day (PMID 42380310).

Questions to ask a surgeon

  • Ask which SMAS method is planned for each side of the face, and why (PMID 19319074).
  • Ask how long results last in the surgeon's own patients and when they come back for a second lift (PMID 20224461).
  • Ask how often the surgeon sees temporary facial weakness with the chosen method (PMID 30768122).
  • Ask whether fat grafting is planned for lost cheek volume (PMID 24569422).
  • Ask the surgeon to check for a cross-cheek groove before surgery (PMID 18971739).

Open questions

  • Extent of dissection against result: cadaver gains from extended work are small (PMID 36332084), and clinical comparisons show similar results at 3 months (PMID 42384060) and 1 year (PMID 8942899).
  • Durability: no randomized long-term comparison of SMAS methods exists (PMID 41100833).
  • Nerve risk rises with deeper and more forward dissection (PMID 30768122).
  • Treating the SMAS with light to make it hold sutures better has been tested only in the laboratory (PMID 41322035).

Terms

  • SMAS: superficial musculoaponeurotic system, the fibrous and muscle layer under the facial fat (PMID 935283).
  • Plication: folding the SMAS on itself with stitches, without lifting it (PMID 36332084).
  • Imbrication (SMAS stacking): cutting the SMAS and overlapping the edges (PMID 19319074).
  • Lateral SMASectomy: removing a strip of SMAS over the front edge of the parotid gland (PMID 18922307).
  • High SMAS: a SMAS flap cut along the cheekbone arch to include the midface (PMID 36563671).
  • Extended SMAS: a SMAS flap dissected forward past the retaining ligaments (PMID 41100833).
  • Skin-only lift: a skin flap with no SMAS work, now a small share of facelifts (PMID 38302713).
  • Joker line: a cross-cheek groove from the mouth corner toward the ear (PMID 18971739).

Papers

PMID First author Year Journal Title Finding
38302713 Stein MJ 2024 Aesthetic Plast Surg Clinical Practice Patterns in Facelift Surgery: A 15-Year Review of Continuous Certification Tracer Data from the American Board of Plastic Surgery. Board tracer data: plication is the most common SMAS method; fat grafting rising
36729730 Avashia YJ 2023 Plast Reconstr Surg An Evidence-Based and Case-Based Comparison of Modern Face Lift Techniques. Evidence and case review: satisfaction similar across lift techniques; fat grafting used with all
41100833 Schultz KP 2026 Plast Reconstr Surg Demystifying Deep Layer Face-Lift Techniques: A Systematic Review of Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System Techniques. Systematic review: deeper, more forward SMAS work not shown to improve the midface or longevity
36332084 Rao V 2023 Plast Reconstr Surg Quantifying the Effective Lift of Skin-Only, SMAS Plication, and Extended SMAS Face-Lift Techniques in a Cadaveric Study. Cadaver: SMAS lifts raise the face vertically; extended SMAS adds little over plication except the lower face
19319074 Rohrich RJ 2009 Plast Reconstr Surg The individualized component face lift: developing a systematic approach to facial rejuvenation. Individualized component face lift: SMAS method chosen for each side of the face (landmark)
18922307 Baker DC 2008 Clin Plast Surg Lateral SMASectomy, plication and short scar facelifts: indications and techniques. Lateral SMASectomy: flap pull with plication speed in selected patients (landmark)
9252623 Baker DC 1997 Plast Reconstr Surg Lateral SMASectomy. Lateral SMASectomy described (landmark)
928549 Owsley JQ Jr 1977 Plast Reconstr Surg Platysma-fascial rhytidectomy: a preliminary report. SMAS and platysma lifted as one flap (landmark)
6828592 Owsley JQ Jr 1983 Plast Reconstr Surg SMAS-platysma face lift. SMAS-platysma face lift, longer experience (landmark)
36563671 Marten T 2022 Facial Plast Surg High SMAS Facelift: Combined Single Flap Lifting of the Midface, Cheek, and Jawline. High SMAS: one flap lifts midface, cheek and jawline
19332004 Barton FE Jr 2002 Aesthet Surg J The "high SMAS" face lift technique. High SMAS technique steps (landmark)
14663239 Barton FE Jr 2003 Plast Reconstr Surg The high-superficial musculoaponeurotic system technique in facial rejuvenation: an update. High SMAS: the fold beside the mouth improved in nearly all patients with deep folds (landmark)
9252622 Baker TJ 1997 Plast Reconstr Surg Personal technique of face lifting. Extended SMAS personal technique (landmark)
928550 Rees TD 1977 Plast Reconstr Surg A clinical evaluation of the results of submusculo-aponeurotic dissection and fixation in face lifts. Split-face: early sub-SMAS lift looked the same as skin-only at late review (landmark)
1409995 Barton FE Jr 1992 Plast Reconstr Surg Rhytidectomy and the nasolabial fold. Releasing the deep SMAS attachments improves the fold beside the mouth (landmark)
20335873 Trussler AP 2010 Plast Reconstr Surg The frontal branch of the facial nerve across the zygomatic arch: anatomical relevance of the high-SMAS technique. The forehead branch is protected under a separate fascia over the cheekbone arch (landmark)
20224461 Sundine MJ 2010 Plast Reconstr Surg Longevity of SMAS facial rejuvenation and support. Patients who returned to the same surgeon had their second SMAS flap lift about 12 years after the first (landmark)
42384060 Neel OF 2026 Aesthetic Plast Surg Deep Plane Versus SMAS Plication Facelift: A Prospective Cohort Study of Clinical Outcomes and Complication Rates. Deep plane against SMAS plication: same satisfaction, recovery and complications
30768122 Jacono AA 2019 Aesthet Surg J A Meta-Analysis of Complication Rates Among Different SMAS Facelift Techniques. Meta-analysis: temporary nerve weakness, hematoma and skin loss differ by SMAS technique
38283861 Mortada H 2024 JPRAS Open Evolution of Superficial Muscular Aponeurotic System Facelift Techniques: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Complications and Outcomes. Systematic review: satisfaction above 85%; temporary nerve injury under 1%
8942899 Ivy EJ 1996 Plast Reconstr Surg Is there a difference? A prospective study comparing lateral and standard SMAS face lifts with extended SMAS and composite rhytidectomies. Split-face: limited and extended SMAS lifts looked the same at 6 and 12 months (landmark)
37619977 Grotting JC 2024 Aesthet Surg J Superior Vector Plication of the Mobile Anterior Midface: The Delta Facelift. Delta facelift: plication moved close to the mobile cheek fat
42192009 Öreroğlu AR 2026 Aesthetic Plast Surg Double-Sling Composite Facelift. Double-sling composite facelift
42380310 De Riso S 2026 Aesthetic Plast Surg SMAS Plication Facelift and Platysmaplasty Under Tumescent Local Anesthesia: A 10-Year Retrospective Evaluation of Safety, Efficacy, and Patient Satisfaction in an Outpatient Setting. SMAS plication and neck tightening under local anesthesia as an outpatient
41322035 Tereshenko V 2025 Aesthet Surg J Open Forum Increasing Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System Durability and Retention in Facelift Surgery. Laboratory: light treatment strengthens the SMAS hold on sutures
40719487 Ganesh Kumar N 2025 Plast Reconstr Surg Role of Selective Neck Sutures in Face Lifts. Selective neck sutures close dead space to lower hematoma risk
24569422 Rohrich RJ 2014 Plast Reconstr Surg Lift-and-fill face lift: integrating the fat compartments. Lift-and-fill: SMAS lift plus fat grafting to the cheek compartments
41251721 Pak KY 2026 J Craniofac Surg Evaluating Facelift Outcomes and Technique Trends in the United States. Survey of facial plastic surgeons: most perform deep plane; longevity not linked to technique
18971739 Lambros V 2008 Plast Reconstr Surg The cross-cheek depression: surgical cause and effect in the development of the "joker line" and its treatment. Cross-cheek depression (joker line) after face lift: often visible before surgery (landmark)

Papers cited

Newest first.

2026
Demystifying Deep Layer Face-Lift Techniques: A Systematic Review of Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System Techniques
Schultz KP, Sherif R, Ganesh Kumar N, Stuzin JM, Rohrich RJ · Plast Reconstr Surg · Systematic Review · PMID 41100833
2025
Role of Selective Neck Sutures in Face Lifts
Ganesh Kumar N, Sherif R, Schultz K, Hidalgo DA, Stuzin JM, Rohrich RJ · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 40719487
2025
Increasing Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System Durability and Retention in Facelift Surgery
Tereshenko V, Hussey MR, McCormack MC, Austen WG · Aesthet Surg J Open Forum · PMID 41322035
2023
An Evidence-Based and Case-Based Comparison of Modern Face Lift Techniques
Avashia YJ, Stuzin JM, Cason RW, Savetsky IL, Rohrich RJ · Plast Reconstr Surg · Systematic Review · PMID 36729730
2014
Lift-and-fill face lift: integrating the fat compartments
Rohrich RJ, Ghavami A, Constantine FC, Unger J, Mojallal A · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 24569422
2010
The frontal branch of the facial nerve across the zygomatic arch: anatomical relevance of the high-SMAS technique
Trussler AP, Stephan P, Hatef D, Schaverien M, Meade R, Barton FE · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 20335873
2009
The individualized component face lift: developing a systematic approach to facial rejuvenation
Rohrich RJ, Ghavami A, Lemmon JA, Brown SA · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 19319074
2002
The "high SMAS" face lift technique
Barton FE · Aesthet Surg J · PMID 19332004
1997
Lateral SMASectomy
Baker DC · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 9252623
1997
Personal technique of face lifting
Baker TJ, Stuzin JM · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 9252622
1996
1992
Rhytidectomy and the nasolabial fold
Barton FE · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 1409995
1983
SMAS-platysma face lift
Owsley JQ · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 6828592