Home / Procedures / Safety and recovery / Facelift complications and outcomes

Facelift complications and outcomes

Serious complications after a facelift are uncommon: about 1 patient in 55 needs an emergency visit, a hospital stay or a second operation, most often for a hematoma. Patients rate their results highly at one year, and most still rate them well more than a decade later as aging continues.

The risks in numbers

  • Major complications: about 1 in 55 facelifts; hematoma about 1 in 90 and infection about 1 in 300. The rate was about 1 in 65 for a facelift alone and up to about 1 in 27 when other operations were added (PMID 26578747).
  • Who is at higher risk: men had about four times the hematoma risk; overweight patients and combined procedures had more infections (PMID 26578747). Patients over 55, men and patients with high blood pressure or on aspirin had more hematomas in another large series (PMID 22446820).
  • Facial nerve: any weakness of a facial muscle followed about 1 in 150 facelifts in pooled data, and permanent weakness about 1 in 2,000 (PMID 40456989).
  • By technique: pooled deep-plane studies found any complication in about 1 in 15, temporary nerve weakness in about 1 in 80, hematoma in about 1 in 55, skin loss in about 1 in 1,000, and no permanent nerve injury (PMID 42576065). SMAS techniques had temporary nerve injury in about 1 in 120 (PMID 38283861). Short-incision facelifts had complications in about 1 in 30 (PMID 37950895).

Hematoma

  • Bleeding under the skin flap is the most common serious complication (PMID 26578747). It followed about 1 in 25 facelifts in a large series from 2001 (PMID 11513508). In pooled deep-plane studies any hematoma occurred in about 1 in 37 and a major hematoma in about 1 in 100 (PMID 41203255).
  • In 2014 Auersvald reported the hemostatic net, a running stitch that tacks the skin flap down: no netted patient had a hematoma in the first three days, against about 1 in 7 before he used it, with no rise in poor blood supply to the skin (PMID 23949130).
  • Tranexamic acid, tissue sealants and nets each went with major hematoma rates of about 1 in 65 to 1 in 80 in pooled deep-plane studies (PMID 41203255).

Facial nerve injury

  • In 1979 nerve injury followed under 1 in 100 facelifts, and more than 4 in 5 recovered within six months (PMID 515227). Pooled data from recent decades give similar rates (PMID 40456989).
  • Most injuries are temporary: about 7 in 10 recover fully within six months without surgery, and about 1 in 10 keep some weakness (PMID 41273502).
  • Surveyed facial plastic surgeons report temporary weakness in 1 to 5 of every 100 cases, most often the muscle that lowers the lower lip; it was more common with deep-plane lifts and frequent salivary gland reduction (PMID 41251721).
  • Pooled data link temporary injury to deeper techniques (high lateral SMAS and composite lifts), with no difference in permanent injury by technique (PMID 30768122).
  • Revision facelifts carry more risk: temporary nerve injury about 1 in 14, against about 1 in 45 in first facelifts (PMID 35511039).
  • When paralysis persists, a referral center explored and repaired some nerves; about half of patients in both the surgical and non-surgical groups regained normal function (PMID 38015890).
  • Rarely, complete paralysis of one side of the face follows a facelift; it is most often linked to Bell's palsy and is usually treated with steroids (PMID 37897668).

Skin loss and smoking

  • Smokers have damage in the small blood vessels of the skin, and skin loss after facelift was linked to smoking after surgery (PMID 3952215).
  • A facelift with limited skin lifting avoided skin loss in a series where about a third of patients smoked (PMID 3952216). Deep-plane lifts have been proposed as an alternative for smokers (PMID 21768564).
  • Pooled data across elective plastic surgery did not show a significant rise in total facelift complications in smokers (PMID 29426809).

Infection

  • Infection followed about 1 in 300 facelifts (PMID 26578747).
  • A review sets out the evidence on antibiotics before surgery, clearing skin bacteria, keeping the patient warm, body weight and smoking (PMID 25539351).

Signs of an operated face

  • Pixie ear: the earlobe pulled down and forward onto the cheek by tension on the skin flap; it appeared in about 1 in 20 earlobe repairs in a review (PMID 39013675).
  • Lateral sweep: a pulled look toward the ear. Hamra traced it to lifts that pull only sideways while the cheek and lower lid tissue keep falling, often with hollow eyes after lower lid fat is removed (PMID 9774028, PMID 11802570). A vertical sweep deformity has also been described (PMID 28006056).
  • Joker line: a groove running from the mouth corner toward the ear. Most patients who develop it show a version before surgery, and it is treated by adding volume (PMID 18971739).
  • Hamra proposed lifting the cheek and the muscle around the eye upward and inward, and keeping lower lid fat, to prevent and correct the "face-lifted" look (PMID 9774028, PMID 11802570).

How long results last

  • A second facelift came an average of 9 to 12 years after the first in a review of secondary lifts (PMID 42382704). After SMAS flap facelifts the interval averaged about 12 years, and about 1 in 5 patients returned within five years (PMID 20224461).
  • Nearly all patients rated their result very good or better at one year; about two in three did so at about 12 years, as aging continued (PMID 20224460).
  • Patients under 50 rated their improvement as lasting longer (PMID 22186515).
  • Fuller necks relapsed more over 25 years of one surgeon's practice, and opening the midline neck muscle reduced the return of neck bands (PMID 27348643).
  • In identical twins, a full incision gave a better neck at five years than a short-scar lift (PMID 26890507).
  • No randomized study has measured how long a facelift lasts; the figures come from revision intervals and surveys (PMID 20224461, PMID 20224460).

How much younger patients look

  • Patients felt about six to seven years younger after a facelift (PMID 25909302, PMID 30488241). Satisfaction with the decision was high, and the neck and the area under the chin scored lowest (PMID 25909302).
  • Blinded observers judged patients about five years younger (PMID 29040425).
  • Face-age software read patients as about 3.5 years younger at three months and 1.7 years younger at 12 months, with no technique ahead of another (PMID 36706713). Software and observers consistently estimate a smaller change than patients do (PMID 34181603, PMID 39085528).
  • Adding procedures such as fat grafting raised satisfaction after high-SMAS facelifts (PMID 28002252).

Revision and second facelifts

  • Second facelifts make up a growing share of facelifts by board-certified plastic surgeons (PMID 38302713).
  • They are harder: the SMAS is thinner and the planes are scarred, complication rates vary widely, and temporary nerve injury reaches about 1 in 8 in some series (PMID 42382704).
  • Patients were at least as satisfied with a second facelift as with the first, and more extra procedures were added (PMID 9326793).

Questions to ask a surgeon

  • How often do your patients have a hematoma, and what do you do to prevent it? (PMID 26578747)
  • How often do your patients have facial weakness, and how long does it last? (PMID 40456989)
  • Should I stop smoking, and for how long? (PMID 3952215)
  • How do you avoid a pulled look or a pixie ear? (PMID 11802570)
  • How long do your results usually last? (PMID 20224461)
  • What would a second facelift involve for me? (PMID 42382704)

Open questions

  • Nerve injury rates range from under 1 in 100 in pooled data (PMID 40456989) to 1 to 5 in 100 in a surgeon survey (PMID 41251721), depending on definition and reporting.
  • Durability has no randomized evidence; figures come from revision intervals and surveys (PMID 20224461, PMID 20224460).
  • Software age estimates run below patients' own (PMID 34181603, PMID 39085528).
  • Smoking: strong evidence of vessel damage (PMID 3952215) but no significant facelift effect in pooled data (PMID 29426809).
  • Neck results by technique: open platysmaplasty with liposuction and closed techniques scored differently in selected patients (PMID 42500364).

Terms

  • Major complication (CosmetAssure): a complication needing an emergency visit, admission or reoperation within 30 days (PMID 26578747).
  • Neuropraxia: a temporary nerve conduction block that recovers (PMID 41273502).
  • Skin slough / necrosis: death of part of the skin flap (PMID 3952215).
  • Pixie ear: an earlobe pulled down and forward onto the cheek (PMID 39013675).
  • FACE-Q: a validated patient questionnaire for facial aesthetic procedures (PMID 24105086, PMID 25626785).
  • Apparent age: the age observers assign from photographs (PMID 29040425).
  • Secondary facelift: a second facelift after a prior one (PMID 42382704).

Papers

PMID First author Year Journal Title Finding
26578747 Gupta V 2016 Aesthet Surg J Preoperative Risk Factors and Complication Rates in Facelift: Analysis of 11,300 Patients. CosmetAssure: major complications in about 1 in 55 facelifts (landmark)
20224460 Friel MT 2010 Plast Reconstr Surg The measure of face-lift patient satisfaction: the Owsley Facelift Satisfaction Survey with a long-term follow-up study. Owsley survey: satisfaction high at a year, lower at 12 years (landmark)
30488241 Berger M 2019 Aesthetic Plast Surg Assessing Improvement of Patient Satisfaction Following Facelift Surgery Using the FACE-Q Scales: A Prospective and Multicenter Study. FACE-Q gains stable 3 to 12 months
22446820 Abboushi N 2012 Aesthet Surg J Facelift complications and the risk of venous thromboembolism: a single center's experience. Facelift complication risk factors (landmark)
42576065 Koroma P 2026 Aesthetic Plast Surg Deep Plane Facelifts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes. Deep plane meta-analysis: complication rates
38283861 Mortada H 2024 JPRAS Open Evolution of Superficial Muscular Aponeurotic System Facelift Techniques: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Complications and Outcomes. SMAS techniques review: nerve injury and skin necrosis
37950895 Amador RO 2024 Aesthet Surg J Limited Incision Facelifts: A Contemporary Review of Approaches and Complications. Limited incision facelifts: low complication rate
11513508 Grover R 2001 Br J Plast Surg The prevention of haematoma following rhytidectomy: a review of 1078 consecutive facelifts. Hematoma after facelift (landmark)
41203255 Azzi JL 2026 Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med Prevention of Hematoma in Patients Undergoing Facelift (Rhytidectomy): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Deep plane hematoma rate
515227 Baker DC 1979 Plast Reconstr Surg Avoiding facial nerve injuries in rhytidectomy. Anatomical variations and pitfalls. Nerve injury uncommon; most recover (landmark)
40456989 Gandra G 2025 Aesthetic Plast Surg Facelift Surgery and Nerve Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nerve injury meta-analysis: permanent motor injury rare
41273502 Arianpour N 2025 Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg Management and outcomes of facial nerve injury following rhytidectomy: a systematic review. Nerve injury management review
30768122 Jacono AA 2019 Aesthet Surg J A Meta-Analysis of Complication Rates Among Different SMAS Facelift Techniques. Complications by SMAS technique
41251721 Pak KY 2026 J Craniofac Surg Evaluating Facelift Outcomes and Technique Trends in the United States. Surgeon survey: transient nerve injury
38015890 Kaufman Goldberg T 2024 Plast Reconstr Surg Post-Face Lift Facial Paralysis: A 20-Year Experience. Post-facelift paralysis referral series
37897668 Venditto CM 2024 Aesthet Surg J Complete Hemifacial Paralysis Post-facelift: Making Sense of a Plastic Surgeon's Worst Nightmare. Hemifacial paralysis after facelift linked to Bell's palsy
35511039 Chang KN 2022 Plast Reconstr Surg Analysis of the Outcome of Reoperative Face Lifts Using Sub-SMAS Techniques. Revision facelift: more temporary nerve injury
3952215 Riefkohl R 1986 Plast Reconstr Surg Association between cutaneous occlusive vascular disease, cigarette smoking, and skin slough after rhytidectomy. Smoking, dermal vascular disease and skin slough (landmark)
3952216 Webster RC 1986 Plast Reconstr Surg Cigarette smoking and face lift: conservative versus wide undermining. Conservative undermining in smokers: no slough (landmark)
21768564 Parikh SS 2011 Arch Facial Plast Surg Deep-plane face-lift as an alternative in the smoking patient. Deep plane in smokers (landmark)
29426809 Theocharidis V 2018 J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg Current evidence on the role of smoking in plastic surgery elective procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Smoking meta-analysis: facelift effect not significant
23949130 Auersvald A 2014 Aesthetic Plast Surg Hemostatic net in rhytidoplasty: an efficient and safe method for preventing hematoma in 405 consecutive patients. Net: no rise in ischemia or necrosis (landmark)
25539351 Dauwe PB 2015 Plast Reconstr Surg Infection in face-lift surgery: an evidence-based approach to infection prevention. Infection prevention review (landmark)
39013675 Vaccari S 2024 Surgery The pixie ear: How to prevent and correct it-a review of the literature. Pixie ear review
18971739 Lambros V 2008 Plast Reconstr Surg The cross-cheek depression: surgical cause and effect in the development of the "joker line" and its treatment. Cross-cheek depression (landmark)
9774028 Hamra ST 1998 Plast Reconstr Surg Frequent face lift sequelae: hollow eyes and the lateral sweep: cause and repair. Hollow eyes and lateral sweep (landmark)
28006056 Jacono AA 2017 JAMA Facial Plast Surg Vertical Sweep Deformity After Face-lift. Vertical sweep deformity (landmark)
11802570 Hamra ST 2000 Facial Plast Surg Prevention and correction of the "face-lifted" appearance. Preventing the face-lifted look (landmark)
20224461 Sundine MJ 2010 Plast Reconstr Surg Longevity of SMAS facial rejuvenation and support. SMAS facelift lasts about 12 years on average (landmark)
9326793 Guyuron B 1997 Plast Reconstr Surg Secondary rhytidectomy. Secondary rhytidectomy interval and satisfaction (landmark)
42382704 Saad C 2026 JPRAS Open Challenges and complications in secondary rhytidectomies, a systematic review. Secondary rhytidectomy review
22186515 Liu TS 2012 Plast Reconstr Surg Long-term results of face lift surgery: patient photographs compared with patient satisfaction ratings. Younger patients rate longer results (landmark)
27348643 Rohrich RJ 2016 Plast Reconstr Surg Long-Term Results in Face Lifting: Observational Results and Evolution of Technique. Rohrich 25-year observations (landmark)
37619977 Grotting JC 2024 Aesthet Surg J Superior Vector Plication of the Mobile Anterior Midface: The Delta Facelift. Delta facelift: few repeat lifts
26890507 Antell DE 2016 Plast Reconstr Surg A Comparison of the Full and Short-Scar Face-Lift Incision Techniques in Multiple Sets of Identical Twins. Twins: full incision better neck at 5 years (landmark)
24105086 Klassen AF 2014 Plast Reconstr Surg Measuring outcomes that matter to face-lift patients: development and validation of FACE-Q appearance appraisal scales and adverse effects checklist for the lower face and neck. FACE-Q facelift scales validated (landmark)
25626785 Klassen AF 2015 Plast Reconstr Surg FACE-Q scales for health-related quality of life, early life impact, satisfaction with outcomes, and decision to have treatment: development and validation. FACE-Q quality-of-life scales validated (landmark)
25909302 Sinno S 2015 Plast Reconstr Surg Face-Lift Satisfaction Using the FACE-Q. FACE-Q facelift satisfaction (landmark)
28002252 Kappos EA 2017 Plast Reconstr Surg Validating Facial Aesthetic Surgery Results with the FACE-Q. FACE-Q after high-SMAS lifts (landmark)
42500364 Fiore G 2026 Aesthet Surg J Open Forum A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Role of Open Platysmaplasty in Facelift and Necklift Surgery: Comparative Outcomes of Closed- vs Open-Neck Rejuvenation With Liposuction Using FACE-Q Scales. Neck FACE-Q meta-analysis by technique
29040425 Frautschi RS 2018 Aesthet Surg J Apparent Age is a Reliable Assessment Tool in 20 Facelift Patients. Apparent age reliable; about five years younger (landmark)
34181603 Zhang BH 2021 Plast Reconstr Surg Turning Back the Clock: Artificial Intelligence Recognition of Age Reduction after Face-Lift Surgery Correlates with Patient Satisfaction. Software age reduction correlates with satisfaction
36706713 Elliott ZT 2023 Am J Otolaryngol Artificial intelligence for objectively measuring years regained after facial rejuvenation surgery. Software: younger at 3 months, less so at 12
39085528 Du H 2024 Aesthetic Plast Surg Age Reduction After Face-Lift Surgery in Chinese Population: An Outcome Study Using Artificial Intelligence and Objective Observer-Based Assessment. Software in Chinese patients: smaller change than self-rating
42775335 Tan SJ 2026 Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Comparing Deep Plane and Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System Facelifts Using Artificial Intelligence-Based Age Estimation. Software: deep plane and SMAS no different
38302713 Stein MJ 2024 Aesthetic Plast Surg Clinical Practice Patterns in Facelift Surgery: A 15-Year Review of Continuous Certification Tracer Data from the American Board of Plastic Surgery. Board data: secondary facelifts rising
41673281 Şibar S 2026 Aesthetic Plast Surg Revision Neck Lift Surgery: A Systematic Review of Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes. Revision neck lift review

Papers cited

Newest first.

2026
Deep Plane Facelifts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes
Koroma P, Reji N, Burridge I, Shah M, Gopi P, Lee K, et al. · Aesthetic Plast Surg · PMID 42576065 · Plain summary
2026
Prevention of Hematoma in Patients Undergoing Facelift (Rhytidectomy): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Azzi JL, Hadian A, Zabihi-Pour D, Omar Y, Urichuk M, Maas C, et al. · Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med · Systematic Review · PMID 41203255
2026
Challenges and complications in secondary rhytidectomies, a systematic review
Saad C, Ishak R, Joumaa JP, Harb I, Emmanuel N, Nicolas G, et al. · JPRAS Open · PMID 42382704 · Plain summary
2025
Facelift Surgery and Nerve Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Gandra G, Silva BS, Horta R · Aesthetic Plast Surg · Systematic Review · PMID 40456989
2025
Management and outcomes of facial nerve injury following rhytidectomy: a systematic review
Arianpour N, Khiabani K, Aberoumand H, Pourhoseini A · Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 41273502
2024
Post-Face Lift Facial Paralysis: A 20-Year Experience
Kaufman Goldberg T, McGonagle ER, Hadlock TA · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 38015890
2024
Complete Hemifacial Paralysis Post-facelift: Making Sense of a Plastic Surgeon's Worst Nightmare
Venditto CM, Grotting JC, Auersvald A, Johnson DJ, Labbé D, Hodgkinson D, et al. · Aesthet Surg J · PMID 37897668
2024
The pixie ear: How to prevent and correct it-a review of the literature
Vaccari S, Fondrini R, Ragaini E, Lozito A, Andreoletti S, Capuano SM, et al. · Surgery · PMID 39013675
2023
Artificial intelligence for objectively measuring years regained after facial rejuvenation surgery
Elliott ZT, Bheemreddy A, Fiorella M, Martin AM, Christopher V, Krein H, et al. · Am J Otolaryngol · PMID 36706713
2018
Current evidence on the role of smoking in plastic surgery elective procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Theocharidis V, Katsaros I, Sgouromallis E, Serifis N, Boikou V, Tasigiorgos S, et al. · J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg · Meta-Analysis · PMID 29426809
2018
Apparent Age is a Reliable Assessment Tool in 20 Facelift Patients
Frautschi RS, Duraes EF, Tadisina KK, Couto RA, Zins JE · Aesthet Surg J · PMID 29040425
2017
Vertical Sweep Deformity After Face-lift
Jacono AA, Malone MH · JAMA Facial Plast Surg · PMID 28006056
2017
Validating Facial Aesthetic Surgery Results with the FACE-Q
Kappos EA, Temp M, Schaefer DJ, Haug M, Kalbermatten DF, Toth BA · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 28002252
2016
Preoperative Risk Factors and Complication Rates in Facelift: Analysis of 11,300 Patients
Gupta V, Winocour J, Shi H, Shack RB, Grotting JC, Higdon KK · Aesthet Surg J · PMID 26578747
2015
Infection in face-lift surgery: an evidence-based approach to infection prevention
Dauwe PB, Pulikkottil BJ, Scheuer JF, Stuzin JM, Rohrich RJ · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 25539351
2015
Face-Lift Satisfaction Using the FACE-Q
Sinno S, Schwitzer J, Anzai L, Thorne CH · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 25909302
2012
Facelift complications and the risk of venous thromboembolism: a single center's experience
Abboushi N, Yezhelyev M, Symbas J, Nahai F · Aesthet Surg J · PMID 22446820
2011
1997
Secondary rhytidectomy
Guyuron B, Bokhari F, Thomas T · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 9326793
1986
1986
Cigarette smoking and face lift: conservative versus wide undermining
Webster RC, Kazda G, Hamdan US, Fuleihan NS, Smith RC · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 3952216