Home / Procedures / Lips, chin and fat / Sliding genioplasty

Sliding genioplasty

A sliding genioplasty reshapes the chin by cutting the lower front of the jawbone through an incision inside the mouth, moving the chin segment and fixing it in its new place. With a facelift it does a second job: bringing the chin bone forward also firms the tissue under the chin and along the jaw.

What it is

The chin is bone covered by muscle, fat and skin, and the soft tissue follows the bone: when the chin segment moves forward, the skin over it moves about 9 mm for every 10 mm of bone (PMID 16849066, PMID 26321067). Because the surgeon moves the bone itself, the operation can correct a chin that is too small, too prominent, too long, too short or off center; an implant can only add projection (PMID 11176712, PMID 40555381).

For a person having a facelift, the chin is also the front support of the jawline and neck. Moving the bone forward improves the projection of the lower face, tightens loose tissue under the jaw and supports the soft tissue around the mouth (PMID 35704425). The advanced chin pulls the muscles under the chin tighter (PMID 9105353).

Where it came from

  • Trauner and Obwegeser described the chin osteotomy in 1957, in their work on correcting the lower jaw (PMID 13441284). Converse published the horizontal osteotomy of the lower jaw in 1964 (PMID 14223248).
  • In 1987 Spear showed it could be done as an outpatient operation under local anesthesia, taking under an hour on average (PMID 3299418).
  • In 1990 Guyuron compared it with chin implants: patients were satisfied with both, and the bone operation gave a more predictable soft-tissue result and a better angle between chin and neck (PMID 2399851).
  • In 1996 Ousterhout showed that keeping the bone cut well below the canal of the chin nerve prevents permanent numbness (PMID 9133835). In 1997 Wider reported two decades of genioplasty done at the same sitting as a facelift (PMID 9105353).
  • Recent work refines planning and the soft tissue: computer planning and ultrasonic bone saws (PMID 40555381), fixation that leaves the chin muscle attached to the bone (PMID 34529592) and fat grafting beside the cut (PMID 37452130).

Who it suits

  • A small or receding chin. Advancement alone gave the highest long-term satisfaction of any chin movement (PMID 39193247). Aesthetic patients need smaller advancements than reconstructive patients (PMID 9105353).
  • Loose tissue under the chin and jaw. In selected patients the advance improves the jawline and neck along with the chin (PMID 35704425), and combining it with contouring under the chin improves the result when the new projection suits the face (PMID 17549558).
  • A chin that is long, short, asymmetric or too prominent. Only the bone operation changes chin height and corrects asymmetry (PMID 11176712). Patients who had the chin set back were the least satisfied (PMID 39193247).
  • An older patient with a mildly small chin. Guyuron considered an implant a reasonable choice for this patient (PMID 2399851).
  • A chin implant that has to come out. Removing an implant can leave a sagging, puckered chin, so an osteotomy at the same operation is advised (PMID 2052662); problem silicone implants are often replaced with a sliding genioplasty (PMID 41753014).
  • Snoring or sleep apnea. Moving the chin changes the airway: lengthening the chin was linked to a wider airway and shortening it to a narrower one (PMID 41569264).

How it is done

  • Through an incision inside the lower lip, the surgeon cuts the bone horizontally below the tooth roots, moves the segment and fixes it with a plate or screws (PMID 11176712, PMID 40555381). Movements can be planned on scans with virtual surgical planning and cut with an ultrasonic saw (PMID 40555381).
  • Protecting the nerve. The mental nerve leaves the bone on each side of the chin and gives feeling to the lower lip and chin. Ousterhout kept at least 6 mm between the cut and the nerve canal, and after that change no patient had a permanent nerve injury (PMID 9133835).
  • Protecting the soft chin. Stripping the chin muscle off the bone (degloving) and failing to reattach it allows the soft chin to sag below the bone, the "witch's chin". Fixing the segment with lag screws and a plate that needs no degloving prevented it and gave higher patient satisfaction (PMID 34529592).
  • Fat grafting. The sliding cut does not move the crease between lower lip and chin, so an advance can deepen it; fat injected there prevents that (PMID 37452130).
  • Anesthesia. Local anesthesia as an outpatient (PMID 3299418), or general anesthesia when it is combined with a facelift or other operations (PMID 9105353).
  • Bone healing. The gap left between the bone segments fills in; a wider gap slowed healing only slightly (PMID 40965831).

Results and how long they last

  • The bone stays where it is put. A year or more after an advancement, the chin point had lost between a fraction of a millimeter and about 2 mm of the forward move, and the loss did not depend on how far the chin moved or how it was fixed (PMID 33583665). At 3 years no patient had a change that mattered clinically (PMID 16849066).
  • The soft chin keeps following the bone. At 2 years and later the skin of the chin had moved about 8 to 9 mm for every 10 mm of bone (PMID 34383152). Soft tissue tracks bone more closely after an osteotomy than over an implant (PMID 40666078, PMID 2399851).
  • Satisfaction is high. Patients are satisfied after both osteotomy and implants, and comparisons favor the osteotomy (PMID 2399851, PMID 37059630, PMID 40666078). Satisfaction stayed high unless the chin was moved too far forward (PMID 9105353). The most common complaint afterward was a chin that sat off center (PMID 39193247).
  • Measured change in the face. Face-analysis software found small gains in attractiveness scores, larger in patients 35 and older (PMID 41530558).
  • Studies measure outcomes in different ways, which makes them hard to compare (PMID 40271466).

Risks and how surgeons lower them

  • Numb lower lip and chin. Almost every patient has some numbness at first (PMID 17549558). Temporary nerve symptoms followed about 1 in 6 osteotomies in a pooled review, against about 1 in 40 implants (PMID 36729154), and numbness lasted in roughly 1 in 8 to 1 in 13 osteotomy patients (PMID 40666078). After a chin cut alone, without other jaw surgery, feeling returned fully in one surgeon's series (PMID 17549558), and formal testing found a lasting light-touch deficit only rarely (PMID 3422277); numbness is more frequent when the chin cut is combined with a split of the lower jaw (PMID 12377203). A wide margin between the cut and the nerve canal prevents permanent injury (PMID 9133835).
  • A second operation. About 1 in 13 patients needed one, for loose fixation, appearance, a step felt along the jaw edge or remaining sleep apnea; patients over 35 needed it more often than those 25 or younger (PMID 33905017).
  • Any complication. About 1 in 5 after osteotomy and 1 in 6 after implants in a pooled review, with the difference mostly temporary numbness (PMID 36729154). Implants carried more infection, up to about 1 in 4 in some series, and more wound opening (PMID 40666078, PMID 37059630).
  • Sagging soft chin. About 1 in 4 patients after the traditional degloving technique, and none after the no-degloving technique (PMID 34529592).
  • Too much chin. In Wider's facelift series the most common complaint was a chin that looked too strong; most of those patients had surgery early in the series, and the bone was burred down (PMID 9105353).
  • Bleeding under the tongue. Rare, but a hematoma in the floor of the mouth can push the tongue back and block the airway; the arteries at risk run under the tongue and under the chin (PMID 36730838).
  • With jaw surgery. Adding a genioplasty to two-jaw surgery lengthened the operation without raising 30-day complications in national data (PMID 34510068).
  • Revision. A second chin operation works through scar, changed anatomy and a reduced blood supply (PMID 9246516).

Recovery

  • Care includes a compression dressing on the chin, treatment of swelling and a liquid diet for a period (PMID 40555381).
  • Pain was mild after outpatient surgery under local anesthesia (PMID 3299418).
  • Lower lip numbness usually lasts a few weeks; at a year or more, more than 9 in 10 patients reported normal feeling (PMID 17549558). In a randomized trial, numbness had resolved on both sides by 6 months (PMID 35210126).
  • Platelet products placed at the bone cut sped the return of feeling: concentrated growth factor in one trial (PMID 35210126), and platelet-rich fibrin at 1 and 4 months, with no difference by 12 months, in another (PMID 37612225).

With a facelift

  • Genioplasty can be done safely at the same sitting as a facelift and liposuction under the chin (PMID 9105353). Chin complications in Wider's series were minor: hematomas drained in the office, a temporary weakness of the lower lip, a temporary numb lip and an infection cleared with antibiotics (PMID 9105353).
  • Jones combines it with facelifts and prefers it to implants for its range of movement and long-term stability (PMID 17046627).
  • Dekker and Baker read the bone of the lower face to decide when an osteotomy should support the soft tissue, alone or with a neck lift, liposuction or facelift (PMID 35704425).

Questions to ask a surgeon

  • Would a sliding genioplasty or an implant suit my chin better? (PMID 2399851)
  • How far will you move the bone, and will my chin change in height? (PMID 11176712)
  • How will you keep the cut away from the nerve to my lower lip? (PMID 9133835)
  • Will you strip the chin muscle off the bone, and how will you reattach it? (PMID 34529592)
  • How will the crease between my lip and chin change? (PMID 37452130)
  • Will moving my chin change my breathing at night? (PMID 41569264)
  • How often do your genioplasty patients need a second operation? (PMID 33905017)

Open questions

  • Airway: isolated genioplasty enlarged the airway in one study (PMID 37883707) and in pooled data (PMID 40626109), while another study found overall narrowing tied to shortening the chin (PMID 41569264).
  • Osteotomy or implant: more nerve symptoms with osteotomy, more infection and wound problems with implants, and higher satisfaction with osteotomy, mostly from single-center studies (PMID 40666078, PMID 37059630).
  • Outcome measures are not standardized (PMID 40271466).
  • Platelet products for faster nerve recovery rest on small trials (PMID 35210126, PMID 37612225).
  • Scoring results with face-analysis software is new and has not been tied to what patients report (PMID 41530558).

Terms

  • Genioplasty: surgery that changes the shape or position of the chin (PMID 40555381).
  • Osseous (sliding) genioplasty: a horizontal cut through the chin bone with the segment moved and fixed (PMID 11176712).
  • Pogonion: the most forward point of the chin (PMID 33583665).
  • Relapse: the part of the chin movement lost over time (PMID 33583665).
  • Soft-to-hard tissue ratio: how far the skin moves for each millimeter the bone moves (PMID 26321067).
  • Mental nerve: the nerve that gives feeling to the lower lip and chin (PMID 9133835).
  • Degloving: stripping the soft tissue off the chin bone to expose it (PMID 34529592).
  • Witch's chin (chin ptosis): soft tissue of the chin sagging below the bone (PMID 34529592).
  • Labiomental groove: the crease between the lower lip and the chin (PMID 37452130).
  • Microgenia: a small chin (PMID 40666078).

Papers

PMID First author Year Journal Title Finding
17046627 Jones BM 2006 J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg Osseous genioplasty in facial aesthetic surgery--a personal perspective reviewing 54 patients. Aesthetic osseous genioplasty, often with facelift; preferred over implants for versatility and stability
11176712 Chang EW 2001 Arch Facial Plast Surg Sliding genioplasty for correction of chin abnormalities. Sliding genioplasty corrects projection, height and asymmetry; high satisfaction, little bone resorption
35704425 Dekker PK 2022 Aesthet Surg J Incorporating the Osseous Genioplasty Into Rejuvenation of the Lower Face. Osteotomy supports lower face soft tissue; algorithm for rejuvenation patients
13441284 TRAUNER R 1957 Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol The surgical correction of mandibular prognathism and retrognathia with consideration of genioplasty. I. Surgical procedures to correct mandibular prognathism and reshaping of the chin. Trauner and Obwegeser chin osteotomy (landmark)
14223248 CONVERSE JM 1964 Plast Reconstr Surg HORIZONTAL OSTEOTOMY OF THE MANDIBLE. Horizontal osteotomy of the mandible (landmark)
2399851 Guyuron B 1990 Aesthetic Plast Surg A critical comparison of osteoplastic and alloplastic augmentation genioplasty. Osteotomy against implant: more predictable soft tissue, better neck-chin angle (landmark)
40555381 Minehart BR 2025 Facial Plast Surg Nuances in Genioplasty. Technique review: intraoral approach, virtual planning, ultrasonic saw
9133835 Ousterhout DK 1996 J Craniofac Surg Sliding genioplasty, avoiding mental nerve injuries. 6 mm margin from the nerve canal prevented permanent nerve injury (landmark)
3299418 Spear SL 1987 Plast Reconstr Surg Sliding genioplasty as a local anesthetic outpatient procedure: a prospective two-center trial. Outpatient genioplasty under local anesthesia: mild pain, high satisfaction (landmark)
17549558 Hoenig JF 2007 Aesthetic Plast Surg Sliding osteotomy genioplasty for facial aesthetic balance: 10 years of experience. Isolated sliding genioplasty: transient numbness, full sensory recovery
34529592 Zhang BH 2021 Plast Reconstr Surg Osseous Genioplasty: Prevention of Witch's Chin Deformity with No-Degloving Technique. No-degloving technique prevented witch's chin
37452130 Guyuron B 2023 Aesthetic Plast Surg The Versatile Role of Fat Injection During Various Genioplasties. Fat injection prevents deepening of the lip-chin crease
40965831 Hu K 2026 J Craniofac Surg Bone Healing Following Osseous Genioplasty is Minimally Impacted by the Osteotomy Gap Width. Osteotomy gap width has a small effect on bone healing
40271466 Dalmeijer SWR 2025 Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr Evaluating Genioplasty Procedures: A Systematic Review and Roadmap for Future Investigations. Systematic review: outcome measures not standardized
33583665 Janssens E 2021 J Craniomaxillofac Surg Long-term stability of isolated advancement genioplasty, and influence of associated risk factors: A systematic review. Stability review: relapse 0.1 to 2.1 mm after 1 year
16849066 Shaughnessy S 2006 Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Long-term skeletal and soft-tissue responses after advancement genioplasty. Advancement stable at 3 years; soft tissue follows bone 0.9 to 1
26321067 San Miguel Moragas J 2015 J Craniomaxillofac Surg A systematic review on soft-to-hard tissue ratios in orthognathic surgery part II: Chin procedures. Soft-to-hard tissue ratio 0.9 to 1 for advancement
34383152 George JA 2022 Oral Maxillofac Surg Long-term hard and soft tissue response following isolated genioplasty: a systematic review. Long-term soft tissue response 0.77 to 0.91 per mm of bone
39193247 Razmara F 2024 World J Plast Surg Satisfaction Level of Patients with the Outcome of Genioplasty. Advancement most satisfying, setback least; off-center chin the top complaint
33905017 Kongsong W 2022 Oral Maxillofac Surg Reoperative genioplasty: a 10-year retrospective study. Reoperation 7.6%; less likely at age 25 or under
41530558 Fenske J 2026 Aesthetic Plast Surg AI-Based Quantitative and Objective Analysis of Aesthetic Results in Genioplasty. AI scoring: small gains, larger in patients 35 and older
37883707 Valls-Ontañón A 2024 Aesthet Surg J Does Aesthetic Osseous Genioplasty Impact Upper Airway Volume? Isolated genioplasty increased airway volume
40626109 Kauke-Navarro M 2025 Aesthet Surg J Open Forum Osseous Genioplasty and Its Impact on Airway Volume-What is the Evidence? Airway review: most studies report airway enlargement
41569264 Kauke-Navarro M 2026 Plast Reconstr Surg The Impact of Aesthetic Osseous Genioplasty on Upper Airway Volumes - A Single Center Retrospective Cohort Study. Vertical chin movement drives airway change
36729154 Oranges CM 2023 Plast Reconstr Surg Chin Augmentation Techniques: A Systematic Review. Systematic review: osteotomy complications 19.7%, transient nerve injury 16.4%
40666078 Kauke-Navarro M 2025 Aesthet Surg J Open Forum Implant-Based Chin Augmentation Vs Osseous Genioplasty: A Systematic Review of Indications and Outcomes. Implant against osteotomy review: numbness persists in 7.4% to 12.5%
3422277 Nishioka GJ 1988 J Oral Maxillofac Surg Neurosensory disturbance associated with the anterior mandibular horizontal osteotomy. Light-touch deficit rare after chin osteotomy
12377203 Gianni AB 2002 J Craniomaxillofac Surg Neurosensory alterations of the inferior alveolar and mental nerve after genioplasty alone or associated with sagittal osteotomy of the mandibular ramus. Numbness more frequent with an added sagittal split
36730838 Choi BK 2023 J Craniofac Surg Vascular Anatomy for the Prevention of Sublingual Hematomas: Life-Threatening Complication of Genioplasty. Sublingual hematoma can block the airway
9105353 Wider TM 1997 Plast Reconstr Surg Simultaneous osseous genioplasty and meloplasty. Genioplasty with facelift over two decades; satisfaction high unless overadvanced (landmark)
34510068 Jazayeri HE 2022 J Craniofac Surg Major Complications and Associated Risk Factors for Osseous Genioplasty With Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery: An American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis. National data: genioplasty adds operating time, not 30-day complications
9246516 Guyuron B 1997 Clin Plast Surg Problems following genioplasty. Diagnosis and treatment. Diagnosis and treatment of problems after genioplasty
35210126 Wang X 2022 Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg Effect of concentrated growth factor on lower lip hypoesthesia after osseous genioplasty: a prospective, split-mouth, double-blind randomized controlled trial. Randomized: growth factor speeds lip numbness recovery
37612225 Behnia P 2023 Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg Does leucocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin enhance neurosensory recovery after genioplasty? A double-blind, split-mouth, randomised clinical trial. Randomized: L-PRF speeds sensory recovery to 4 months
2052662 Cohen SR 1991 Plast Reconstr Surg Chin disfigurement following removal of alloplastic chin implants. Immediate osseous genioplasty after implant removal (landmark)
41753014 Pokrowiecki R 2026 J Clin Med Revision Surgery After Complications of Silicone Chin Implants. Silicone implant revisions converted to sliding genioplasty
37059630 Tabrizi R 2024 Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg Osseous genioplasty versus chin implants: early complications and patient satisfaction. Genioplasty against implants: fewer infections, higher satisfaction

Papers cited

Newest first.

2026
The Impact of Aesthetic Osseous Genioplasty on Upper Airway Volumes - A Single Center Retrospective Cohort Study
Kauke-Navarro M, Kong V, Flores-Pérez P, Rancu AL, Diatta F, Parker E, et al. · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 41569264
2026
Bone Healing Following Osseous Genioplasty is Minimally Impacted by the Osteotomy Gap Width
Hu K, Parikh N, Ihnat J, Wasserburg JR, Collar JL, Aral A, et al. · J Craniofac Surg · PMID 40965831
2026
AI-Based Quantitative and Objective Analysis of Aesthetic Results in Genioplasty
Fenske J, Knoedler S, Niederegger T, Bigus S, Voss JO, Pooth R, et al. · Aesthetic Plast Surg · PMID 41530558
2025
Nuances in Genioplasty
Minehart BR, Barrera JE · Facial Plast Surg · PMID 40555381
2025
Implant-Based Chin Augmentation Vs Osseous Genioplasty: A Systematic Review of Indications and Outcomes
Kauke-Navarro M, Knoedler L, Allam O, Heiland M, Knoedler S, Klimitz FJ, et al. · Aesthet Surg J Open Forum · PMID 40666078
2025
Evaluating Genioplasty Procedures: A Systematic Review and Roadmap for Future Investigations
Dalmeijer SWR, van Riet TCT, Ho JTF, Becking EAG · Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr · PMID 40271466
2024
Osseous genioplasty versus chin implants: early complications and patient satisfaction
Tabrizi R, Behnia P, Kavianipour M, Behnia H · Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg · PMID 37059630
2024
Does Aesthetic Osseous Genioplasty Impact Upper Airway Volume?
Valls-Ontañón A, Arjooca S, Saavedra O, Giralt-Hernando M, Asensio-Salazar J, Haas OL, et al. · Aesthet Surg J · PMID 37883707
2023
2023
Chin Augmentation Techniques: A Systematic Review
Oranges CM, Grufman V, di Summa PG, Fritsche E, Kalbermatten DF · Plast Reconstr Surg · Systematic Review · PMID 36729154
2022
Incorporating the Osseous Genioplasty Into Rejuvenation of the Lower Face
Dekker PK, Slamin RP, Charipova K, Harbour PW, Talbet JH, Abdel Azim S, et al. · Aesthet Surg J · PMID 35704425
2015
A systematic review on soft-to-hard tissue ratios in orthognathic surgery part II: Chin procedures
San Miguel Moragas J, Oth O, Büttner M, Mommaerts MY · J Craniomaxillofac Surg · Systematic Review · PMID 26321067
2001
Sliding genioplasty for correction of chin abnormalities
Chang EW, Lam SM, Karen M, Donlevy JL · Arch Facial Plast Surg · PMID 11176712
1997
Simultaneous osseous genioplasty and meloplasty
Wider TM, Spiro SA, Wolfe SA · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 9105353
1996
Sliding genioplasty, avoiding mental nerve injuries
Ousterhout DK · J Craniofac Surg · PMID 9133835
1990
A critical comparison of osteoplastic and alloplastic augmentation genioplasty
Guyuron B, Raszewski RL · Aesthetic Plast Surg · PMID 2399851