An elegant woman smiling with short grey hair

A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures after facial cosmetic surgery and/or nonsurgical facial rejuvenation

A review of 442 articles found 47 patient questionnaires on facial appearance after cosmetic procedures, but only 9 met inclusion criteria and none met all development and validation guidelines.

Kosowski TR, McCarthy C, Reavey PL, et al.. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2009.

What it means for a patient

  • In 2009, no questionnaire fully met standards for measuring how patients feel about facial cosmetic results.
  • Only one facelift-specific questionnaire met the inclusion criteria, and it too fell short of the guidelines.
  • A surgeon's satisfaction numbers depend on how they were measured. Ask what tool was used.
  • The review covered English-language studies only.

Why this paper matters

It showed the gap in validated patient-reported outcome measures for facial cosmetic surgery. The authors call for a tool that meets accepted standards, to compare techniques and measure benefit in practice.

Overview

Patient satisfaction and quality of life define success in cosmetic surgery, yet few studies measure how patients see their appearance afterward. The authors searched the English-language literature for questionnaires designed to measure satisfaction or quality of life after surgical or nonsurgical facial cosmetic procedures. They checked each against international guidelines.

Findings

  • 442 articles reviewed; 47 patient-reported outcome measures on facial appearance after a cosmetic procedure identified.
  • 9 questionnaires met inclusion and exclusion criteria.
  • Rhinoplasty: Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation, Glasgow Benefit Inventory, Facial Appearance Sorting Test.
  • Skin rejuvenation: Facial Lines Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire, Skin Rejuvenation Outcomes Evaluation, Facial Lines Outcomes Questionnaire.
  • Facelift: Facelift Outcomes Evaluation.
  • Blepharoplasty: listed in the abstract as the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation.
  • General appearance: Derriford Appearance Scale 59.
  • None met all guidelines; each was limited in its development, validation or content.

Terms

  • Patient-reported outcome measure (PROM): a questionnaire a patient fills in about their own results.
  • Systematic review: a study that searches for and appraises all published research on a question.
  • Validation: testing that a questionnaire measures what it claims to.
  • Reliability: whether a questionnaire gives consistent results.
  • Responsiveness: whether a questionnaire detects real change after treatment.
  • Quality of life: how a condition or treatment affects daily life and well-being.
  • Blepharoplasty: eyelid surgery.

Newest papers on outcomes and longevity

The latest studies on the same subject.

2026
Comment on: Facelift surgery under local anesthesia: A scoping review of current practices and outcomes
Dupuy F, Despert H, Oubari H, Dinahet T, Boucher F, Henry G, et al. · Ann Chir Plast Esthet · PMID 42532689

More plain summaries on outcomes and longevity

2026
"Objectifying Outcomes in Facial Aesthetic Surgery Using Artificial Intelligence"
Rames JD, Lipinski A, Alameddine KO, Kreutz-Rodrigues L, Sinha K, Martinez-Jorge J, et al. · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 42658153 · Plain summary
2026
Deep Plane Facelifts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes
Koroma P, Reji N, Burridge I, Shah M, Gopi P, Lee K, et al. · Aesthetic Plast Surg · PMID 42576065 · Plain summary
2026
Two Endoscopic Surgical Approaches to Facial Rejuvenation: A Longitudinal Study on Safety and Patient Satisfaction
Chartier A, Kenny-Howell L, Gervais V, Haddad J · Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open · PMID 42565105 · Plain summary